Who | When | Language | Genre | Title / Character | Books | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shakespeare | 1582–1616 | English | Dramaturgy | UK | ||
Agatha Christie | 1890-1976 | English | Mystery | Hercule Poirot | 85 | UK |
Barbara Cartland | 1901-2000 | English | Romance | 723 | UK | |
Danielle Steel | 1947- | English | Romance | 120 | USA | |
Harold Robbins | 1916-1997 | English | Adventure | 23 | USA | |
Georges Simenon | 1903-1989 | French | Mystery | Commissaire Maigret | 570 | Belgium |
Sidney Sheldon | 1907-2007 | English | Modern novel | The Other Side of Midnight | 21 | USA |
Enid Blyton | 1897-1968 | English | Children's literature | 800 | UK | |
Dr. Seuss | 1904-1991 | English | Children's literature | Horton Hears a Who! | 44 | USA |
Gilbert Patten | 1866-1945 | English | Dime novels | 209 | USA | |
J. K. Rowling | 1951- | English | Fantasy | Harry Potter | 11 | UK |
Leo Tolstoy | 1828-1910 | Russian | Classic novel | War and Peace, Anna Karenina | 48 | Russia |
Corín Tellado | 1927-2009 | Spanish | Romance | 4,000 | Spain | |
Jackie Collins | 1937-2015 | English | Romance | 25 | UK | |
Horatio Alger, Jr. | 1832-1899 | English | Dime novels | 135 | USA | |
R. L. Stine | 1943- | English | Horror, Fantasy | 430+ | USA | |
Dean Koontz | 1945- | English | Horror, Fantasy | 91 | USA | |
Nora Roberts | 1950- | English | Romance | 200+ | USA | |
Alexander Pushkin | 1799-1837 | Russian | Poetry, Classic Novel | Eugene Onegin | 17 | Russia |
Stephen King | 1947- | English | Horror, Fantasy | The Shining | 70 | USA |
Louis L'Amour | 1908-1988 | English | Western | 101 | USA | |
Erle Stanley Gardner | 1889-1970 | English | Mystery | Perry Mason | 140 | USA |
Jin Yong | 1924- | Chinese | Wuxia (Fantasy) | 15 | Hong Kong | |
Jirō Akagawa | 1948- | Japanese | Mystery | 500+ | Japan | |
Janet Dailey | 1944-2013 | English | Romance | 93 | USA | |
Edgar Wallace | 1875-1932 | English | Mystery | King Kong | 175 | UK |
Robert Ludlum | 1927-2001 | English | Spy stories | Jason Bourne | 40 | USA |
James Patterson | 1947- | English | Thriller | Alex Cross | 98 | USA |
Frédéric Dard | 1924-2000 | French | Mystery | 300 | Switzerland | |
Jeffrey Archer | 1940- | English | Mystery | The sins of the father | 30 | UK |
Stan and Jan Berenstain | 1923-2005 | English | Children's literature | Berenstain Bears | 300+ | USA |
John Grisham | 1955- | English | Legal thriller | The Firm | 22 | USA |
Zane Grey | 1872-1939 | English | Western | USA | ||
Irving Wallace | 1916-1990 | English | Modern novel | USA | ||
J. R. R. Tolkien | 1892-1973 | English | Fantasy | The Lord of the Rings | 36 | UK |
Karl May | 1842-1912 | German | Western, Adventure | 80 | Germany | |
Mickey Spillane | 1918-2006 | English | Mystery | Mike Hammer | USA | |
C. S. Lewis | 1898-1963 | English | Fantasy | The Chronicles of Narnia | 38 | UK |
Kyotaro Nishimura | 1930- | Japanese | Mystery | 400+ | Japan | |
Dan Brown | 1964- | English | Thriller, Adventure | The Da Vinci Code | 6 | USA |
Ann M. Martin | 1955- | English | Children's litterature | The Baby-sitters Club | 335 | USA |
Ryōtarō Shiba | 1923-1996 | Japanese | Historical novel | 350 | Japan | |
Arthur Hailey | 1920-2004 | English | Modern novel | Airport | 11 | UK/Canada |
Gérard de Villiers | 1929-2013 | French | Spy stories | SAS | 170 | French |
Beatrix Potter | 1866-1943 | English | Children's literature | The Tale of Peter Rabbit | 23 | UK |
Michael Crichton | 1942-2008 | English | Techno thriller | Jurassic Park | 25 | USA |
Richard Scarry | 1919-1994 | English | Children's books | Best Word Book Ever | 250 | USA |
Clive Cussler | 1931- | English | Adventure | Sahara | 37 | USA |
Alistair MacLean | 1922-1987 | English | Adventure | The Guns of Navarone | 32 | UK |
Ken Follett | 1949- | English | Spy stories | Eye of the Needle | 30 | UK |
Astrid Lindgren | 1902-2002 | Swedish | Children's books | Pippi Longstocking | 100 | Sweden |
Debbie Macomber | 1948- | English | Romance | USA | ||
Paulo Coelho | 1947- | Portuguese | Fantasy | The Alchemist | Brazil | |
E.L. James | 1963- | English | Romance, Erotica | Fifty Shades of Grey | 3 | UK |
Eiji Yoshikawa | 1892-1962 | Japanese | Historical novel | Musashi | 7 | Japan |
Catherine Cookson | 1906-1998 | English | Romance | 103 | UK | |
Stephenie Meyer | 1973- | English | Fantasy | The Twilight Saga | 6 | USA |
Norman Bridwell | 1928-2014 | English | Children's literature | Clifford the Big Red Dog | 80 | USA |
David Baldacci | 1960- | English | Thriller | 25 | USA | |
Roald Dahl | 1916-1990 | English | Children's literature | Charlie and the Chocolate Factory | 50 | UK |
Evan Hunter | 1926-2005 | English | Mystery | Cop Hater | 94 | USA |
Andrew Neiderman | 1940- | English | Fantasy | The Devil's Advocate | 60 | USA |
Roger Hargreaves | 1935-1988 | English | Children's literature | Mr. Men | 10 | UK |
Anne Rice | 1941- | English | Fantasy | Interview with the Vampire | 27 | USA |
Robin Cook | 1940- | English | Medical thriller | Coma, Outbreak | 27 | USA |
Wilbur Smith | 1933- | English | African adventure | When the Lion Feeds | 32 | Zambia |
Erskine Caldwell | 1903-1987 | English | Modern novel | Tobacco Road | 25 | USA |
Judith Krantz | 1928- | English | Romance | Mistral's Daughter | 12 | USA |
Eleanor Hibbert | 1906-1993 | English | Romance, Historical, | 200 | UK | |
Lewis Carroll | 1862-1898 | English | Children's literature, Fantasy | Alice in Wonderland | 5 | UK |
Denise Robins | 1897-1985 | English | Romance | 200 | UK | |
Cao Xueqin | 1715-1763 | Chinese | Classic novel | Dream of the Red Chamber | China | |
Ian Fleming | 1908-1964 | English | Spy stories | James Bond | 14 | UK |
Hermann Hesse | 1877-1962 | German | Spiritual novel | Steppenwolf, Siddhartha | 45 | Switzerland |
Rex Stout | 1886-1975 | English | Mystery | Nero Wolfe | 50 | USA |
Anne Golon | 1921- | French | Historical Romance | Angélique | 14 | French |
Frank G. Slaughter | 1908-2001 | English | Medical, Historical novel | 62 | USA | |
Edgar Rice Burroughs | 1875-1950 | English | Adventure, Fantasy | Tarzan | USA | |
John Creasey | 1908-1973 | English | Mystery | 600 | UK | |
James Michener | 1907-1997 | English | Historical novel | Tales of the South Pacific | 47 | USA |
Yasuo Uchida | 1934- | Japanese | Mystery | The Togakushi Legend Murders | 130+ | Japan |
Seiichi Morimura | 1933- | Japanese | Mystery, Historical | The Devil's Gluttony | 350+ | Japan |
Mary Higgins Clark | 1927- | English | Thriller | Where Are The Children? | 51 | USA |
Penny Jordan | 1946-2011 | English | Romance | 200+ | UK | |
Patricia Cornwell | 1956- | English | Thriller | 34+ | USA | |
Charles Dickens | 1812-1970 | English | Classic Novel | Oliver Twist , A Christmas Carol | UK | |
Alexandre Dumas | 1802-1970 | French | Classic Novel | The Three Musketeers | France | |
Miguel de Cervantes | 1547-1616 | Spanish | Classic Novel | Don Quixote | Spain | |
Jack Higgins | 1929- | English | Thriller | The Eagle has Landed | 84 | USA |
Tom Clancy | 1947-2013 | English | Adventure | The Hunt for Red Octobe | USA | |
Arthur Conan Doyle | 1859-1930 | English | Mystery | Sherlock Holmes | USA | |
Victor Hugo | 1802-1885> | French | Classic Novel | Les Misérables, Notre-Dame de Paris | France | |
Jules Verne | 1828-1905 | French | Classic Novel | Around the World in Eighty Days | France |
Monday, August 22, 2016
Best selling authors of all times
Thursday, October 02, 2014
Pixar’s 22 Rules of Storytelling
1. You admire a character for trying more than for their successes.
2. You gotta keep in mind what’s interesting to you as an audience, not what’s fun to do as a writer. They can be very different.
3. Trying for theme is important, but you won’t see what the story is actually about til you’re at the end of it. Now rewrite.
4. Once upon a time there was ___. Every day, ___. One day ___. Because of that, ___. Because of that, ___. Until finally ___.
5. Simplify. Focus. Combine characters. Hop over detours. You’ll feel like you’re losing valuable stuff but it sets you free.
6. What is your character good at, comfortable with? Throw the polar opposite at them. Challenge them. How do they deal?
7. Come up with your ending before you figure out your middle. Seriously. Endings are hard, get yours working up front.
8. Finish your story, let go even if it’s not perfect. In an ideal world you have both, but move on. Do better next time.
9. When you’re stuck, make a list of what WOULDN’T happen next. Lots of times the material to get you unstuck will show up.
10. Pull apart the stories you like. What you like in them is a part of you; you’ve got to recognize it before you can use it.
11. Putting it on paper lets you start fixing it. If it stays in your head, a perfect idea, you’ll never share it with anyone.
12. Discount the 1st thing that comes to mind. And the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th – get the obvious out of the way. Surprise yourself.
13. Give your characters opinions. Passive/malleable might seem likable to you as you write, but it’s poison to the audience.
14. Why must you tell THIS story? What’s the belief burning within you that your story feeds off of? That’s the heart of it.
15. If you were your character, in this situation, how would you feel? Honesty lends credibility to unbelievable situations.
16. What are the stakes? Give us reason to root for the character. What happens if they don’t succeed? Stack the odds against.
17. No work is ever wasted. If it’s not working, let go and move on – it’ll come back around to be useful later.
18. You have to know yourself: the difference between doing your best & fussing. Story is testing, not refining.
19. Coincidences to get characters into trouble are great; coincidences to get them out of it are cheating.
20. Exercise: take the building blocks of a movie you dislike. How d’you rearrange them into what you DO like?
21. You gotta identify with your situation/characters, can’t just write ‘cool’. What would make YOU act that way?
22. What’s the essence of your story? Most economical telling of it? If you know that, you can build out from there.
Sunday, October 30, 2011
Orwell’s 5 Rules for Effective Writing
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
This sounds easy, but in practice is incredibly difficult. Phrases such as toe the line, ride roughshod over, stand shoulder to shoulder with, play into the hands of, an axe to grind, Achilles’ heel, swan song, and hotbed come to mind quickly and feel comforting and melodic.
For this exact reason they must be avoided. Common phrases have become so comfortable that they create no emotional response. Take the time to invent fresh, powerful images.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
Long words don’t make you sound intelligent unless used skillfully. In the wrong situation they’ll have the opposite effect, making you sound pretentious and arrogant. They’re also less likely to be understood and more awkward to read.
When Hemingway was criticized by Faulkner for his limited word choice he replied:
Poor Faulkner. Does he really think big emotions come from big words? He thinks I don’t know the ten-dollar words. I know them all right. But there are older and simpler and better words, and those are the ones I use.
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
Great literature is simply language charged with meaning to the utmost possible degree (Ezra Pound). Accordingly, any words that don’t contribute meaning to a passage dilute its power. Less is always better. Always.
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
This one is frequently broken, probably because many people don’t know the difference between active and passive verbs. I didn’t myself until a few months ago. Here is an example that makes it easy to understand:
The man was bitten by the dog. (passive)The dog bit the man. (active).The active is better because it’s shorter and more forceful.
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
This is tricky because much of the writing published on the internet is highly technical. If possible, remain accessible to the average reader. If your audience is highly specialized this is a judgment call. You don’t want to drag on with unnecessary explanation, but try to help people understand what you’re writing about. You want your ideas to spread right?
6. Break any of these rules sooner than saying anything outright barbarous.
This bonus rule is a catch all. Above all, be sure to use common sense.These rules are easy to memorize but difficult to apply. Although I’ve edited this piece a dozen times I’m sure it contains imperfections. But trust me, it’s much better now than it was initially. The key is effort. Good writing matters, probably more than you think.
I hope you find these rules helpful, and through their application we’re able to understand each other a little bit better. If you enjoyed this post, be sure to read Orwell’s original essay. It contains many helpful examples and is, of course, a pleasure to read.
Friday, October 14, 2011
A Typology of Folktales
ANIMAL TALES
- Wild Animals 1-99
- The Clever Fox (Other Animal) 1-69
- Other Wild Animals 70-99
- Wild Animals and Domestic Animals 100-149
- Wild Animals and Humans 150-199
- Domestic Animals 200-219
- Other Animals and Objects 220-299
- Supernatural Adversaries 300-399
- Supernatural or Enchanted Wife (Husband) or Other Relative 400-459
- Wife 400-424
- Husband 425-449
- Brother or Sister 450-459
- Supernatural Tasks 460-499
- Supernatural Helpers 500-559
- Magic Objects 560-649
- Supernatural Power or Knowledge 650-699
- Other Tales of the Supernatural 700-749
- God Rewards and Punishes 750-779
- The Truth Comes to Light 780-791)
- Heaven 800-809
- The Devil 810-826
- Other Religious Tales 827-849
- The Man Marries the Princess 850-869
- The Woman Marries the Prince 870-879
- Proofs of FidelitY and Innocence 880-899
- The Obstinate Wife Learns to Obey 900-909
- Good Precepts 910-919
- Clever Acts and Words 920-929
- Tales of Fate 930-949 .7;68
- Robbers and Murderers 950-969
- Other Realistic Tales 970-999
- Labor Contract 1000-1029
- Partnership between Man and Ogre 1030-1059
- Contest between Man and Ogre 1060-1114
- Man Kills (Injures) Ogre 1115-1144
- Ogre Frightened by Man 1145-1154
- Man Outwits the Devil 1155-1169
- Souls Saved from the Devil 1170-1199
- Stories about a Fool 1200-1349
- Stories about Married Couples 1350-1439
- The Foolish Wife and Her Husband 1380-1404
- The Foolish Husband and His Wife 1405-1429
- The Foolish Couple 1430-1439
- Stories about a Woman 1440-1524
- Looking for a Wife 1450-1474
- Jokes about Old Maids 1475-1499
- Other Stories about Women 1500-1524
- Stories about a Man 1525-1724
- The Clever Man 1525-1639
- Lucky Accidents 1640-1674
- The Stupid Man 1675-1724
- Jokes about Clergymen and Religious Figures 1725-1849
- The Clergyman is Tricked 1725-1774
- Clergyman and Sexton 1775-1799
- Other Jokes about Religious Figures 1800-1849
- Anecdotes about Other Groups of People 1850-1874
- Tall Tales 1875-1999
- Cumulative Tales 2000-2100
- Chains Based on Numbers, Objects, Animals, or Names 2000-2020
- Chains Involving Death 2021-2024
- Chains Involving Eating 2025-2028
- Chains Involving Other Events 2029-2075
- Catch Tales 2200-2299
- Other Formula Tales 2300-2399
Monday, February 16, 2009
Friday, August 18, 2006
Seth's Blog: Advice for authors
With more than 75,000 books published every year (not counting ebooks or blogs), the odds are actually pretty good that you've either written a book, are writing a book or want to write one.
Hence this short list:
1. Lower your expectations. The happiest authors are the ones that don't expect much.
2. The best time to start promoting your book is three years before it comes out. Three years to build a reputation, build a permission asset, build a blog, build a following, build credibility and build the connections you'll need later.
3. Pay for an eidtor editor. Not just to fix the typos, but to actually make your ramblings into something that people will choose to read. I found someone I like working with at the EFA. One of the things traditional publishers used to do is provide really insightful, even brilliant editors (people like Fred Hills and Megan Casey), but alas, that doesn't happen very often. And hiring your own editor means you'll value the process more.
4. Understand that a non-fiction book is a souvenir, just a vessel for the ideas themselves. You don't want the ideas to get stuck in the book... you want them to spread. Which means that you shouldn't hoard the idea! The more you give away, the better you will do.
5. Don't try to sell your book to everyone. First, consider this: ' 58% of the US adult population never reads another book after high school.' Then, consider the fact that among people even willing to buy a book, yours is just a tiny little needle in a very big haystack. Far better to obsess about a little subset of the market--that subset that you have permission to talk with, that subset where you have credibility, and most important, that subset where people just can't live without your b"
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Overachievers don't write
Overachievers don't write
Whitney Otto
SATURDAY, MAY 13, 2006
PORTLAND, Oregon The beach book, the novel that we take with us on a languorous summer vacation, when we demand that reading be a pleasure and not a chore, the one "serious" readers apologize for even though they shouldn't, is known more formally as genre fiction. The thing that makes genre fiction so appealing is the same thing that can make it such a bore: It's predictable. If the recent rash of novels classified as chick lit were laid end to end, you would have the literary equivalent of a tract-house development.
Sure, some of the houses are beige and others are cream, but they all have the same two-car garage and marble counters in the kitchen. That's why people buy them. That's why Alloy, the book-packaging company that helped Kaavya Viswanathan with "How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life" - portions of which, Viswanathan later admitted, had been copied from other books - specializes in chick lit, the latest incarnation of the romance genre.
I doubt that I'm the first to notice the glaring similarities between romances and chick lit, but in the spirit of recent events, let's say that I am. This is because the pleasure of the predictable romance novel (or chick lit) is the knowledge that a bookish girl can win. A good romance/chick-lit book is about discovery and appreciation. A chick-lit novel tells the reader that humor, imperfect looks and quick wit are desirable even if the world seems to tell the bookish girl otherwise.
And who else would be reading a novel but a bookish girl? Viswanathan is a bookish girl who might have had more success at fiction if she didn't bear the burden of the overachiever. Overachievers don't generally become writers because the skill set is so different. If you want to be a writer, work on the finer points of gossip, eavesdropping and voyeurism; basically the pastimes of the underachiever. If you care to add smoking, drinking and carousing to your repertoire, you wouldn't be the first .
It seems that the first person to see Viswanathan's darker, unfinished novel was her college admissions consultant, someone who, for a nice chunk of change, will get you into that Ivy League college of your choice. The book went on to Alloy, which transformed it into the young-adult chick- lit "Opal Mehta," which borrowed heavily from Megan McCafferty, Sophie Kinsella, Meg Cabot and my favorite, Salman Rushdie, whose name is so often linked with the first three writers.
The mystery of the "Opal Mehta" affair is why would you succumb to the pressure to produce yet another chick lit by-the-numbers book unless you were more motivated by being a writer than actually writing. Viswanathan's collaboration with Alloy would be more understandable if she had been kicking around the publishing scene for a spell, and got really drunk (see above). This is a way of saying that it isn't surprising that a faux writer might want to write a kind of faux novel.
At its best, genre writing can transcend its given genre. Raymond Chandler, James M. Cain and Dashiell Hammett wrote crime classics that often threw an unwelcome light on the ways a person will treat another person given the right circumstances. And Margaret Mitchell's "Gone With the Wind" blew the bodice off almost all other romance novels. But if you aren't compelled to write, because you're maybe an overachieving future investment banker, then a paint-by-number approach might be the way to go, bookwise.
It would take an underachieving, gossipy, voyeuristic, bit of a slacker to write a genre novel capable of pulling away from the pack. In the writing life you can't avoid failure. Or, to put it another way, someone who is driven to write is usually not the same sort of person who would work with an expensive college counselor.
That's a little like expecting a claustrophobe to take up a career in a coal mine. And you can't trade on your youth because being young isn't enough to even know your own story, let alone tell it. Some of the best books ever written about youth are by writers long past those dewy days.
At 68, I'm every age I ever was. I always think that I'm not just 68. I'm also 55 and 21 and 3. Oh, especially 3. George Carlin said that but since I'm in such strong agreement, I might as well have said it.
One could say that a chick-lit book comes with such specific requirements to be considered chick lit that enormous similarities to previous books within the genre are almost inevitable. Or you could just write your own book.
PORTLAND, Oregon The beach book, the novel that we take with us on a languorous summer vacation, when we demand that reading be a pleasure and not a chore, the one "serious" readers apologize for even though they shouldn't, is known more formally as genre fiction. The thing that makes genre fiction so appealing is the same thing that can make it such a bore: It's predictable. If the recent rash of novels classified as chick lit were laid end to end, you would have the literary equivalent of a tract-house development.
Sure, some of the houses are beige and others are cream, but they all have the same two-car garage and marble counters in the kitchen. That's why people buy them. That's why Alloy, the book-packaging company that helped Kaavya Viswanathan with "How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life" - portions of which, Viswanathan later admitted, had been copied from other books - specializes in chick lit, the latest incarnation of the romance genre.
I doubt that I'm the first to notice the glaring similarities between romances and chick lit, but in the spirit of recent events, let's say that I am. This is because the pleasure of the predictable romance novel (or chick lit) is the knowledge that a bookish girl can win. A good romance/chick-lit book is about discovery and appreciation. A chick-lit novel tells the reader that humor, imperfect looks and quick wit are desirable even if the world seems to tell the bookish girl otherwise.
And who else would be reading a novel but a bookish girl? Viswanathan is a bookish girl who might have had more success at fiction if she didn't bear the burden of the overachiever. Overachievers don't generally become writers because the skill set is so different. If you want to be a writer, work on the finer points of gossip, eavesdropping and voyeurism; basically the pastimes of the underachiever. If you care to add smoking, drinking and carousing to your repertoire, you wouldn't be the first .
It seems that the first person to see Viswanathan's darker, unfinished novel was her college admissions consultant, someone who, for a nice chunk of change, will get you into that Ivy League college of your choice. The book went on to Alloy, which transformed it into the young-adult chick- lit "Opal Mehta," which borrowed heavily from Megan McCafferty, Sophie Kinsella, Meg Cabot and my favorite, Salman Rushdie, whose name is so often linked with the first three writers.
The mystery of the "Opal Mehta" affair is why would you succumb to the pressure to produce yet another chick lit by-the-numbers book unless you were more motivated by being a writer than actually writing. Viswanathan's collaboration with Alloy would be more understandable if she had been kicking around the publishing scene for a spell, and got really drunk (see above). This is a way of saying that it isn't surprising that a faux writer might want to write a kind of faux novel.
At its best, genre writing can transcend its given genre. Raymond Chandler, James M. Cain and Dashiell Hammett wrote crime classics that often threw an unwelcome light on the ways a person will treat another person given the right circumstances. And Margaret Mitchell's "Gone With the Wind" blew the bodice off almost all other romance novels. But if you aren't compelled to write, because you're maybe an overachieving future investment banker, then a paint-by-number approach might be the way to go, bookwise.
It would take an underachieving, gossipy, voyeuristic, bit of a slacker to write a genre novel capable of pulling away from the pack. In the writing life you can't avoid failure. Or, to put it another way, someone who is driven to write is usually not the same sort of person who would work with an expensive college counselor.
That's a little like expecting a claustrophobe to take up a career in a coal mine. And you can't trade on your youth because being young isn't enough to even know your own story, let alone tell it. Some of the best books ever written about youth are by writers long past those dewy days.
At 68, I'm every age I ever was. I always think that I'm not just 68. I'm also 55 and 21 and 3. Oh, especially 3. George Carlin said that but since I'm in such strong agreement, I might as well have said it.
One could say that a chick-lit book comes with such specific requirements to be considered chick lit that enormous similarities to previous books within the genre are almost inevitable. Or you could just write your own book.